Project Instructions

SYST 210 Fall 2009 

Overview

You are required to do a system design project to apply the methods you have learned in this course.  In addition to practical experience with the methods taught in this course, the project provides experience working in groups to accomplish a task.

Topic

You may select your own topic for your project.  Please try to make your selection early.  We will have discussions in classes about what makes a good project.  The following two case studies were developed by GMU SE students using SYST 301 case studies as a starting point.  Each case study includes a final report in an older version of the standard GMU-SDD format, and a "rough draft" that includes some common errors students make in system description documents.  You can learn a great deal by comparing the rough drafts to the final reports.
The following case study is the elevator system described in the textbook.  It is another good example to help you do your final project, although it is not in the standard GMU-SDD format.
We are currently working on case studies using SysML and MagicDraw.  Requirements for your project topic (must requirements are non-negotiable; should requirements may be violated with instructor permission if you have a good argument for why it is necessary for your project)

Deliverables

Each group must submit the following deliverables. Deliverables must be inserted into the project notebook in the appropriate section, and the notebook handed in at the beginning of class on the deliverable due date.  If the notebook is not handed in prior to noon on the due date, the deliverable will be marked late.
  1. 24 September, 2009 - Description, references, project plan.  You must hand in a brief (1 page or less) description of your topic and at least three reference sources containing information relevant to your topic.   Your project plan should say how you are dividing up the tasks and how you are coordinating your efforts.  The plan may be in the form of a table.  The first column of the table is a list of tasks to be performed.  The second column is the responsible team member.  Each team member must be responsible for some tasks.  The third column is a list of tasks on which this task depends.  The fourth column is an expected completion date.  The fifth column is the actual completion date.  Most entries in the last column will be blank, but you must hand in an updated version at the end of the semester with the actual completion dates filled in.  If you wish to use an alternate format (e.g., a work breakdown structure and GANTT chart), you may do so.  You will probably want to have at least one task for each deliverable, along with a coordination task. The coordination task is ongoing throughout the semester -- it won't be completed till the end of the semester.  The coordinator is responsible for making sure that all tasks are on track, that everyone knows about meetings, that someone takes minutes at every meeting, etc.
  2. 06 October, 2009 - Draft Statement of Need, Operational Concept, and External Systems Diagram
  3. 15 October, 2009 - Draft Objectives Hierarchy and Originating Requirements
  4. 19 November, 2009 - Draft Functional, Physical, Operational Architectures
  5. 08 December, 2009 - Draft Final Report
  6. 17 December, 2009 - Project Final Report
Each student will also hand in interim self and peer evaluations during the course of the project and final self and peer evaluations at the end of the semester.

The project report must include the following:

Grading

The project is worth 30% of your grade.  Your group will receive a maximum score of 100 points on your project.  These points will be allocated as follows:

Group grade:
  1. Deliverables 1-6, midterm self and peer evaluations - Maximum of 30 points total (5 for each deliverable, 5 for midterm evaluations).  Full score will be awarded if deliverable is handed in on time and reflects a serious attempt at the objective of the deliverable.  
  2. Presentation - Maximum of 25  points total.  Group presentation grade covers overall organization and content of presentation.
  3. Final report  - Maximum of 45 points total.  Final report should be done using a word processor and CORE.  Final report will be graded according to content and professionalism (includes writing and format).  Report must use  GMU System Description Document (GMU-SDD) format (will be updated).
Your individual grade:
  1. Group grade: Maximum of 90 points total.  This part of your grade is based on your group grade adjusted by your self and peer evaluations.  If the group functions well and everyone contributes equally, each of you will receive your group project grade (graded on 100 point scale and multiplied by 0.9).  Your individual grade will be adjusted up or down depending on your self and peer evaluations.
  2. Individual grade for presentation: Maximum of 10 points total. This is an individual grade based on your presentation to the class.